How the Obama Administration Justifies Murdering a 16 Year-Old

When confronted about the murder of Abdulrahman Anwar al-Aulaqi, Anwar al-Awlaki’s 16 year-old son, by drone the Obama administration defended the their actions with one of the sickest justifications I’ve heard:

ADAMSON: …It’s an American citizen that is being targeted without due process, without trial. And, he’s underage. He’s a minor.

GIBBS: I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children. I don’t think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist is the best way to go about doing your business.

It was Abdulrahman’s fault for being assassinated by a United States drone because he had an irresponsible father. I guess that means the Obama administration is going to start murdering a lot of children because there are a lot of irresponsible fathers out there. The current administration is made up of some truly sick sons of bitches.

2 thoughts on “How the Obama Administration Justifies Murdering a 16 Year-Old”

  1. Yeah the killing of Al-Awlaki can at least be semi justified in that he was a self declared enemy of the US, but killing the son because of the father is some medieval vengence bullshit, only employed by criminal regimes. Or at least that is.how.it.should be.

    1. Are you implying the federal government isn’t a criminal regime? 😛

Comments are closed.