It seems the President of Mexico is once again trying to tell us what to do:
Mexican President Felipe Calderon has told the BBC the US should do more to reduce the demand for drugs that is fuelling violence in Mexico.
You want us to do something to reduce the demand for drugs? Sure thing we’ll legalize it all and end the war on drugs. Much like Portugal we should see a drop in drug related violence once they’re legitimized. Of course that’s not acceptable:
Mr Calderon and his counterparts from Colombia and Costa Rica, Juan Manuel Santos and Laura Chinchilla, said legalisation of cannabis in California would send a contradictory message.
God damn it! We offer a solution and you spit on it. What the fuck are we supposed to do?
“It is confusing for our people to see that while we have lost lives and we invest vast resources in the drug war, in the consumer countries they promote proposals like the Californian referendum to legalise the production, the sale and the consumption of marijuana,” said Mr Santos.
I understand that potential freedom and liberty may be confusing to you as presidential equivalent of Columbia but trust me it works. You’d be surprised how popular the idea of liberty really is.
He reiterated his long-standing view that the problem of organised crime would remain as long as the US remained the biggest consumer of drugs in the world.
If it’s no longer criminals to grow, possess, and use the stuff then organized crime will no longer profit from it. Once organized crime no longer profits from it their power base will be knocked out and thus become much less of a problem. A similar thing happened when we ended prohibition in this country many decades ago. But no story about the troubles of Mexico would be complete without the mention of the Mexican gun canard:
Obama administration officials have acknowledged that the US shares responsibility for the drug violence, on account of the demand for illegal drugs and its inability to stop weapons flowing south.
I will give the BBC one thing though, they usually do a good job of covering both sides of a story:
However, US gun rights groups question whether the US is the source for the vast majority of the illegal guns turning up in Mexico.
The majority of guns confiscated by Mexico and submitted to the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) for tracing do originate in the US.
However, a large number of seized weapons are not sent for tracing.
There is your reason so many guns submitted for tracing are found to originate in the US, not many guns are being submitted. For instance there really is no point is submitting a fully automatic AK-47 to the US for tracing being finding such weapons for a reasonable price (as any such weapon made after
1968 1986 is illegal) is practically impossible.
EDIT 2010-10-27 21:05: Had the wrong date posted. It’s corrected now thanks to Jeff.
2 thoughts on “Hey President Calderon I Have a Solution”
The full auto AK was legal till 86, not 68. Given the background checks, and the insane prices of select fire weapons, the US will never be a source of select fire weapons anywhere. They are for wealthy people to collect. Hopefully one of these days we can repeal the Hugh’s amendment so I can get a Glock 18. Of course that won’t help you Minnesotan’s given that you can only own C&Red Machineguns up there.
Yup I mixed up my 6 and 8. I should probably spend more time proof reading.
Comments are closed.