Occupation Minneapolis Bitching About Free Pizza and Tent Confiscation

Friday marked the one week anniversary of the Hennepin Country Government Center Plaza occupation. Unlike last week, this week actually had some relatively exciting occurrences when the occupiers tried to perform their first act of civil disobedience. Namely a group of occupiers decided it was time that they were allowed to put up tents and they planned to give the local police a giant middle finger and start erecting tents against the orders of the country.

I visited the Plaza on Friday evening and Saturday from early afternoon to the early hours of Sunday. Although I had no real stated goal during my visit Friday I was fortunate enough to run into a few of guys from We Are Change. I say this encounter was fortunate because they were playing The American Dream and Freedom to Fascism on a projector in the Plaza in the hopes of educating some of the occupiers about the real state of the Federal Reserve. Although this occupation was originally going to happen at the Minneapolis Federal Reserve the location was changed a little under a week before the occupation was to begin. Besides writing stories one of my goals when visiting the occupation has been to education attendees on economics as such knowledge is sorely lacking.

The guys from We Are Change also ordered seven pizzas which they gave out freely to occupiers. Let me take a moment to warn anybody who plans on brining food to the occupation, there are a handful of really ungrateful fucks there. One of the first people to come by after the pizza arrived said in a really snooty manner, “We’ve resorted to Domino’s?” I replied, “Do you know who else will deliver pizza here at 10:00 at night?” He then said, “They don’t have any vegan pizza.” and walked off. Well tough fucking shit asshole, it’s free pizza, if you don’t like it then don’t fucking eat it. Seriously that prick really rubbed me the wrong way but I’m happy to say he was an exception, most of the people there were damn grateful to receive the bounty of free pizza.

After the pizza was distributed I decided to wander around the Plaza. For those who haven’t been to the Plaza it is broken up into two halves, a south grounds and north grounds. Most of the events occurring at the occupation take place on the northern grounds while people generally sleep on the grassy knoll located on the southern grounds. Friday’s arduous waste of time general assembly took place on the souther grounds. When I ran into the general assembly they were discussing the tent situation. In summary the tent situation was a planned act of civil disobedience where people were planning on showing up and pitching tents on the southern grounds against the country’s ordinances. Although I missed the beginning of the general assembly the later portion involved a great deal of arguing between those wanting to pitch tents and those who were afraid doing so would incite the wrath of the police. I ventured around and periodically returned to see if the general assembly had managed to move on from the topic but every time I returned they were still arguing about the same bloody thing. Finally it was decided that a special tent committee (the occupiers love their committees) meeting would take place after the general assembly to discuss the tent situation.

I attended the tent committee meeting as I was interested in the possibility of civil disobedience finally taking place. As with most committee meetings, the tent committee meeting ended up being mostly a waste of time where an hour or more was spent arguing the inevitable. A long back and forth continued where those opposing the pitching of tents were angrily debating with those who were going to pitch tents. Note the phrasing I used, “were going to pitch tents.” This is what made the debate pointless, those who wanted to pitch tents were going to regardless of what anybody else said (good on them by the way, if you’re planning on doing something then just fucking do it).

Eventually a lady whom I know presented a smart idea which was to build tents out of transparent plastic. I say this was smart because the country’s biggest opposition to allowing occupiers to pitch tents as been the fear that said occupiers would be doing naughty things inside the tents. What happened after this was rather interesting. A couple people in opposition to pitching tents scurried off and accusations started floating around that those people were going to the police. If there is one thing I’ve noticed at this occupation it’s the constant accusations being thrown around that so-and-so is a snitch or plant. Another friend of mine whom I ran into earlier Friday evening informed me that several people believed I was an infiltrator. Anybody who knows me knows that this news was met with a giant, “FUCK YEAH!” I enjoy the art of trolling and if a group of occupiers believe I’m an infiltrator all the better, I’m going to play this card for as long as possible (I’m also the least inconspicuous infiltrator ever, what with my business casual dress, australian hat, and brown oilskin coat). Still the second somebody disappears from a meeting, talks to a cop, nods to a cop, or otherwise does something to raise the ire of another occupier the accusation of that person being a snitch or plant is usually not far behind.

While I believe the tea party has been completely taken over by neocons at this point I still stand behind the original movement which was simply a protest against taxation. The tea party movement and the various occupy movements are often compared. Since I’m not one to pass by low hanging fruit I might as well make a comparison between the tea party movement and the occupy movements. Nobody at any tea party protest I attended every worried about a fellow protester being a plant of police informant. In fact the police were often embraced by those at tea party protests and everybody attitude about government plants was basically, “Whatever, we’re not going anything illegal.” It’s an interesting comparison for sure and I’m not sure if the occupy movement’s obsession with police plants and informants is caused by living in a police state or is a side effect of the collectivist mentality. What I mean by it being a side effect of the collectivist mentality will be covered in a future post as it’s quite a side note to drift off into right now. Either way let’s move onto Saturday’s events.

Among the people at the Plaza on Saturday afternoon were the usual crowd and a religious zealot trying to stir trouble through preaching against abortion, homosexuality, and other similar fundamentalist issues. While several occupiers argued pointlessly with the preacher I moved onto the southern grounds of the Plaza in anticipation of the tent pitching which was scheduled to start at 16:00. On the souther grounds I noticed news trucks from Fox 5, KSTP, and KARE 11 on location awaiting the great act of civil disobedience. 16:00 rolled around and nothing happened, not a single tent was pitched. 16:15 rolled around and still nothing, at this point I figured those who were talking big about pitching tents simply chickened out and the entire occupation lost any hope of appearing serious about anything. I stuck around as there were occupiers slowly gathering in the center of the grassy knoll where many people slept the night before hoping one of them would finally pitch a tent.

Finally at 16:18 two men with tents arrived, went to the center of the grassy knoll, and stood around. Neither pitched their tent though and it appeared as though all the talk, debate, and screaming the night before was for naught. At 16:30 I decided to wander around the Plaza again as nothing was happening on the southern grounds. What I found on the northern grounds shocked me, during the time I went to the southern grounds and when arrived again on the northern grounds some industrious individuals had build shitty, but effective, tents out of boards and transparent plastic. I’m not sure of the time but eventually a large group of people picked up the tents and everybody marched from the northern grounds to the southern grounds of the Plaza changing, “We are the 99%!” While I found the chanting incredibly creepy (I don’t like group chanting at all) I was glad to see the occupiers had more balls than I thought. They moved the tents into the center of the grassy knoll and stood around challenging the police to take them.

Eventually some officers from the Sheriff’s department showed up with camera equipment in two and filmed the entire scene. I had my phone camera out filming the police because I like to return the favor whenever I see evidence of the surveillance state. After some time the police returned to the Plaza building and weren’t heard from again for quite some time. I moseyed around seeing if the country security was going to make a move but they mostly just wander around themselves. At some point in the late afternoon a couple county security officers arrested Melissa Hill. While the charges claimed by the country police was “trespassing on a public sidewalk” it wasn’t until later that I learned Melissa was earlier banned from the Plaza grounds for chalking (while most of the Plaza grounds are now covered in sidewalk chalk I’m not sure what specific circumstance lead to her banishment). Either way she was released fairly quickly.

After Melissa’s arrest not much happen for a long time. I met a few new faces, some other people I know, and had a lot of interesting conversations as I meandered around the grounds looking for anything exciting to write about. One thing I did pass was a Soviet hammer and sickly drawn in sidewalk chalk on a building surface. Due to the wide variety of people attending the event I wasn’t sure if this image was drawn in support of communism or as a criticism of our ever increasing police state. If the image was in support of communism I hope the artist decides to look into the bloody history of the Soviet Union. Anybody who can read about the millions murdered by the Soviet government and still support the system scares the living shit out of me.

During the late evening I decided to move up to the parapet on the southern side of the Hennepin Country building. There were chairs up there and I planned to stick around until the police finally moved to interveine with the occupiers surrounding the tents. Unlike many people I like to clear my head and relax before expected trouble arrises. I found a chair on the parapet, pulled my hat down low, and closed my eyes just listening to the events unfolding around me. Members of the occupation’s media team eventually came up to the parapet and asked people up there to leave as they wanted to setup a “hidden” camera to record any police brutality. They never came over to ask me to leave (which is good because I wouldn’t have left and I don’t like people messing with my zen thing before a big event either) I did get to listen in on their laughable plan. If you’ve never been to the country building let me explain the layout of the parapet; one side faces the grassy knoll while the other side faces a wall of windows making up the center of the country building. Ducking low can prevent you from being seen from the knoll but there is no way you can hide from anybody inside the building. Being the police were inside of the building I thought the media team should have thought their clever plan through a bit more thoroughly.

At one point I was joined by an interesting gentleman whom I talked to for quite some time about various world issues. The man was well traveled, intelligent, and had a great number of stories and ideas which were good to listen to. Like myself he was there more as an observe than a participant and we made some rather interesting observations about the ongoings of the people occupying the knoll. My favorite thing about visiting the Plaza grounds during this occupation has been the interesting conversations I’ve had with random individuals.

Around 1:00 a county officer came onto the parapet and asked those of us up there to move down below as the police were planning to make an announcement. The gentleman and me moved down and sat at the base of the steps while roughly 40 police officers moved out of the county building and surrounded the occupiers on the knoll. The police walked around and announced that the tents were a violation of the occupation’s own bylaws (the organizers of the occupation specifically stated they wouldn’t erect tents) and made one last request for people to remove their tents from the property.

It’s rather funny because the occupiers were planning for everything from tear gas to mace. The street medics all had bottles of water at the read and vinegar to soak bandanas to help reduce the effects of tear case. Escape plans were drawn up, occupiers were warned about what would likely come, and a great deal of effort was put into overcoming the tactics believed to be used by the police to breakup the crowd. The occupiers were ready for everything… everything except one tactics, the police peacefully coming over and simply walking off with the tents.

That’s what the police did, they simply picked up the tents and walked off with them. No tear case was launched, nobody was maced, and no arrests were made. Watching this was downright humeros because the police walking off with the tents reminded me of worker ants carrying leaves back to their nests. They just silently walked in, grabbed a tent, and walked off with it. Likewise the police recorded the entire event while they were removing the tents. It’s not often I get a chance to commend police officers on anything these days but I commend the Hennepin County and Sheriff’s Department officers on their handling of the situation. While I find the country’s ordinances controlling the use of public property to be bullshit I also understand that the police could have been far more violent in their handling of the situation.

There were a couple of occupiers who were downright hilarious. Four cops walking off with a tent hit some handing branches of a tree with the tent and an occupier streams something along the lines of, “OH YOU HIT THE TREE, HOW FUCKING SMART TO YOU FEEL NOW? NO SHIT YOU HIT A FUCKING TREE!” As he was yelling at the cops I made the remark to the gentleman I met earlier saying, “That kid seems to think the police are pretty stupid but they still have his tent.” Another occupier was yelling, “WE’RE FIGHTING FOR YOUR PENSIONS! WHY AREN’T YOU WITH US INSTEAD OF AGAINST US?” If that kid had any brains he could have put two and two together and realized that any officer who joined the occupiers would find himself out of a job which would mean no pay now and no pension later. Yet another funny occurrence was the occupiers chanting, “WE’RE RESISTING ARREST!” I have some bad news for those occupiers, you can’t resist arrest unless you’re being arrested. Since the police weren’t making any arrests there were no grounds to claim you were resisting arrest.

After the police walked off with all of the tents they just vanished back into the county building without saying a word. When the action subsided the gentleman I had been talking to went home and I decided to move up and listen to the aftermath meeting behind held by the occupiers who still remained sans tents. The funniest thing I saw was a sign held by one of the occupiers that said, “Thank a union for your weekend.” Being a union just walked off with their tents this seemed like a rather idiotic sign to be holding. Another girl was going on about the injustice she had to bear, apparently a police officer touched her shoulder when they were taking the tents and she didn’t want to be touched there. She was being incredibly whiny about it and trying to make it sound like being touched on her shoulder was akin to being maced and beaten by a baton. While I respect her resolve in not running at the first sign of police officers I really wanted to go up to her and aske her to kindly shut the hell up. Others were talking about pitching some more tents immediately but nothing appeared to have come of it.

Not surprisingly an emergency committee was formed with the goal of deciding whether or not to pitch new tents immediately, pitch some later, or pitch some on the U.S. Bank grounds. Being I had been at the Plaza for many hours, it was cold as fuck, and I was tired I decided to call it a night and return home.

It was a fun weekend and once again I’m glad I went to the occupation. Every time I visit I managed to walk away with stories to tell and honestly, say what you will about the occupiers, they are some of the friendliest people I’ve ever met. Most of them will talk to anybody and many have interesting stories to tell.

A Terror Plot of Convenience

While I’m a cynical guy I’m generally not what you would consider conspiratorial. Yet when news like this sprouts up at an overly convenient time it’s hard to consider it a coincidence:

The US says it has broken up a plot by agents linked to Iran to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington using explosives.

Two men originally from Iran – one a naturalised US citizen – have been charged with counts of conspiracy, Attorney General Eric Holder said.

[…]

The two accused were named as Manssor Arbabsiar, a 56-year-old naturalised US citizen with dual Iranian and US passports, and Gholam Shakuri, based in Iran and said to be a member of Iran’s Quds Force.

Mr Arbabsiar, who was arrested at New York’s John F Kennedy airport on 29 September, has confessed to his involvement in the alleged plot, Mr Holder said.

Mr Shakuri was said to be in Iran.

US officials said that on 24 May 2011, Mr Arbabsiar made contact with an informant for the US Drug Enforcement Agency, who was posing as a Mexican drug cartel member.

Over a series of meetings, it is said that details emerged of a conspiracy involving members of the Iranian government paying $1.5m (£960,000) for the assassination of Saudi ambassador Adel al-Jubeir on US soil.

Let’s just link up all the memes in this story. Iran hired a member of a Mexican drug cartel to kill a Saudi ambassador in the United States. Somehow the United States was able to swoop in, stop this supposed plot, and hand Eric Holder the credit by having him announce the miraculous work of the United States government. This single story is so convenient that I honestly don’t believe it’s true.

It’s no secret that the United States government wants to go to war with Iran and is simply looking for an excuse that it can feed the American public. Eric Holder is in some very hot water right now due to his knowledge of operation Fast and Furious, which involved the United States government smuggling guns into the hands of Mexican drug cartels . Finally the drug cartels are becoming more of a problem as their violence spills across the American-Mexican border and we’re looking for an excuse to march in after them (mostly so the government can continue it’s war on drugs).

Basically this story creates propaganda against Iran and the Mexican drug cartels while it boosts the image of Eric Holder and America’s anti-terrorist initiative. I’m sorry but this pill is a little hard to swallow. Hell if you’ve ever seen the movie Wag the Dog this is basically the same idea.

Who Needs Crime When You’ve Got Pre-Crime

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) obtained some rather chilling documents through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The documents cover the Department of Motherland Homeland Security’s new Fast Attribute Screening Technology (FAST), or as I like to call it pre-crime:

EPIC filed two Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the United States Department of Homeland Security’s Science & Technology Directorate (S&T) to obtain information about the agency’s public testing of a new sensor array used to conduct covert surveillance of individuals who are not suspected of any crime. The sensors secretly collect and record information concerning individuals, including video images, audio recordings, cardiovascular signals, pheromones, electrodermal activity, and respiratory measurements.

[…]

According to documents published by the Department of Homeland Security, FAST is a Minority Report style initiative that seeks to determining the probability that an individual, who is not suspected of any crime, might commit a future criminal act. Under the FAST program, the DHS will collect and retain of a mix of “physiological and behavioral signals” from individuals as they engage in daily activities.

Not only do we have our government secretly collecting information on citizens but that information is being used to determine whether or not the target has committed a crime without already existing evidence. I would make an argument that any such “evidence” would never hold up in court but, sadly, our “justice” system has demonstrated a willingness to bypass due process in the name of stopping supposed terrorism.

As I’ve said before this country isn’t becoming a police state, it already is a police state. In fact we have a police state to efficient and with such amazing technology at the state’s fingertips that all previous police states would be insanely jealous.

I would like to know how much money has been sunk into these initiatives. I’m sure trillions of dollars have gone into the so-called “war on terror” and we have nothing to show for it other than ever more draconian legislation and technology used to specifically target American citizens.

I Thought it Was 2011, Not 1984

It seems our Earth is moving backwards in time as it’s becoming more like the 1984 presented in Orwell’s well known novel. Along with egregious legislation such as the PATRIOT Act and FISA we now have the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) setting to launch a nationwide facial recognition service:

The FBI by mid-January will activate a nationwide facial recognition service in select states that will allow local police to identify unknown subjects in photos, bureau officials told Nextgov.

The federal government is embarking on a multiyear, $1 billion dollar overhaul of the FBI’s existing fingerprint database to more quickly and accurately identify suspects, partly through applying other biometric markers, such as iris scans and voice recordings.

Often law enforcement authorities will “have a photo of a person and for whatever reason they just don’t know who it is [but they know] this is clearly the missing link to our case,” said Nick Megna, a unit chief at the FBI’s criminal justice information services division. The new facial recognition service can help provide that missing link by retrieving a list of mug shots ranked in order of similarity to the features of the subject in the photo.

While the system is being advertised as a listing of mug shots I wouldn’t be surprised if it contains a far more extensive database of faces. Considering how the FBI considers anybody on the secret watch lists to be a criminal it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if those on the prominent no-fly list are also contained in this database. At the rate the FBI is going they might as well try to get software manufacturers to place backdoors in their software… shit, too late.

I Saw Something So I’m Saying Something

The Department of Motherland Homeland Security has been ramping up their If You See Something, Say Something (IYSSSS) campaign. While I’ve heard of advertisements IYSSSS advertisements being placed on buses in New York but I was unaware of the Twin Cities Metro Transit buses doing the same. To my surprise this is what I saw when leaving the gun show on Saturday morning (click to embiggen):

I apologize for the shitty nature of the photograph but I had to take it with my iPhone camera while at a stop light. While there was no time for actual photography skills I hope that the images can at least be recognized through my dust covered windshield (I fucking hate road construction, it makes keeping a clean vehicle impossible).

These advertisements are like the Big Brother is Watching You posters from 1984 except far more frightening as they’re real. Make no mistake, these advertisements are the product of your tax dollars being spent to incite fear in the populace. The goal of this fear is to maintain the peoples’ obedience while the government continues to grab for far more expansive powers and continue the American people down the road to serfdom.

This country is scaring the shit out of me more and more every day. The fact that the government can spend taxpayer money on fear mongering such as this without causing much in the way of civil unrest isn’t a good sign for days to come. Just remember when this country turns into a complete tyrannical dictatorship there were a few of us trying to warn everybody.

OccpyMN

Accredited journalists are always quick to claim bloggers aren’t real journalists. I’ve always found such claims to be utter malarkey as an accredited journalist is nothing more than a person who expresses news. Guess what? Bloggers can do this as well and I decided to set out to prove as such by performing journalism that most accredited journalists won’t.

There has been a movement to occupy Wall Street in New York. Most people have little or no knowledge of this as major media sources have been unwilling to cover it. Truth be told I know little about the ongoing of the Wall Street occupation but I have interest in it as I have interest in all political dissonance. Regardless of whether or not I agree with political dissenters I do take very active interest in their displays of displeasure with the ongoings of their government.

My interest in political dissonance lead me to a local offshoot of the Wall Street occupation being called OccupyMN. On October 1st, 2011 I set out to attend and write about their gathering where they planned the occupation of, at first, the Minneapolis Federal Reserve but later changed it to the Hennepin County Government Center Plaza.

One of the criticisms being flung at the Wall Street occupation is the fact that there appears to be no notable demands. That is to say most people see the movement is being incredibly disorganized and having no actual aim. Although I can not speak for the movement in New York I can say first hand that the movement in Minneapolis appears to be organized on par with most online movements. I believe the reason people find a lack of cohesiveness with the movement in New York is the same reason they found a lack of cohesiveness with most of Anonymous’s protests; they don’t understand how Internet culture works. As these movements are being organized via the Internet it’s no surprise that the organizational structure occurred as it did. Organization and cohesiveness do exist on many levels of these movements but the decentralized nature has also made neither apparent. It is my hope that this article can clear up some of the misunderstandings surrounding these online organized movements.

The OccupyMN meeting took place at Stevens Square Park in Minneapolis. Starting at 16:00 a meet and greet kicked off events and the general assembly was set to start at 17:15. My arrival time was roughly 16:30 where I was able to converse with the organizer of the meeting and a few other folks there. I was informed by the organizer that the meetup, although advertised as a general assembly, would not be held in such a manner as there are specific rules that must be followed in order to qualify as a general assembly. It seems political disobedience only involves breaking some rules. Anyhow, due to the fact that nobody present had training in organizing general assemblies the event was actually an open forum where decisions were going to be made on a purely democratic basis.

Normally I’m not a fan of pure democracies as they allow a phenomenon known as tyranny of the masses. Instead of going on a long diatribe about pure democracies I’m going to let Spider Jerusalem explain it (click to embiggen):

With that said the OccupyMN movement is entirely voluntary so I have no quarrel with their use of pure democracy. Unlike the state, members of OccupyMN can not legitimately use violence to force others to comply with their demands. If a majority present had voted in favor of everybody getting fucked with a retractable baton it wouldn’t matter as nobody would actually be obligated to take it in the ass from a baton.

Regardless that is how the meeting was to proceed. I also talked to another gentleman who described himself as being a big figured in the local Anonymous movement. He did have the typical Guy Fawkes mask handing around the back of his neck and was very interesting to talk to. The Scientology protests performed by Anonymous were brought up along with mentions of the SlutWalk which had taken place earlier that day. What I found most interesting through was his incite into the Minneapolis Downtown Improvement District (DID). If DID rings a bell it’s because I mentioned them last week in a story about one of their “ambassadors” trying to steal the bike of an anti-war protester. It seems DID likes to flaunt authority which they do not have in attempts to break up protests and demonstrations. That’s what Minneapolis really needs, little tyrants with power complexes marching around as if they are the police. My guess is that “ambassadors” of DID will be appearing more often on this blog.

At 17:03 a woman called for everybody to make a large circle around her. She directed everybody in an ice breaker which I probably looked terribly awkward during as I was taking notes for this article instead of participating. At the end of the ice breaker she asked everybody to join hands and chant, “The people united can never be defeated.” I’m not one to hold hands with complete strangers as there is something very discomforting about the practice to me, so I just claimed to be a germophobe in order to avoid participating. If one of the people standing next to me during the ice breaker is reading this article I apologize for lying to you but it was much easier than explaining my rather odd discomfort when holding hands with people I do not know. I can also state that I felt out of place being an anti-statist while many present were advocating actions that would have required the state to enact additional regulations. While some of the people present seem to believe the government works for them I do not share in that sentiment.

The actual open forum started at 17:14 and the first issue to come up was whether or not video recordings of the event should be allowed. A vote was taken and the vast majority agreed that recording of the event should not be allowed and those already recording were asked to turn off their video cameras. This is where a good old fashion pen and notebook come in handy, nobody usually has a problem with some guy taking notes. Combine the low-tech method of recording this event with my usual charm and charisma and you have… scratch that, I really don’t have a whole heck of a lot of charm or charism. At least I’m a friendly guy though.

A theme that kept cropping up was concern over Minneapolis ordinances. It seems you need a permit in order to use a megaphone within the city of Minneapolis which I find fucking retarded. What is interesting though is that people planning to practice civil disobedience were so concerned with following the city’s laws. Most acts of organized civil disobedience are performed specifically to spit in the fact of undesirable laws. Usually participants are there to give two big fucking middle fingers to the authorities. Such concerns ultimately matter not though as the police will find some obscure law to arrest participants of any movement. I’m sure Minneapolis has at least one 150 year-old law on the books that will be viable mechanism of arresting and prosecuting peaceful protesters.

Since a permit is required to use a megaphone in Minneapolis the organizers educated the group on a system they referred to as the people’s mic. The people’s mic is a very low-tech but effective solution to amplifying the voice of one person. How does it work you ask? It’s so simple a retarded monkey could figure it out, you just have everybody in the group repeat what the speaker is saying. It’s much easier to hear something said by 20 people than something said by one. The downside to this system is that messages take twice as long to say as every piece must first be said by the speaker and then repeated by those acting as the people’s mic. Although a megaphone was used during the meeting most of it was doing by utilized the people’s mic.

The first order of official business was to establish a series of committees. These committees would take care of planning the various logistics of the occupation. While there were many committees rattled off the most interesting one was the public health committee. Why? Because protests like this often require on-site medics but it’s very difficult, if not impossible, to get official medical personel on site. To alleviate this need protests such as this utilize what are known as street medics. The tradition of the street medic appears to have originated during the 1960’s civil rights movement and expanded from there. A street medic is simply a volunteer who has received medical training from another street medic. Unlike licensed medical personel, street medics usually have little formal training and are basically qualified by their mentor street medic saying whether or not the trainee is ready to go it alone. I find this to be a very interesting and cost-effective method of getting first-aid to protesters.

While the various committee names were being rattled off an individual brought up the fact that it would be wise to first define what the occupation is about. Many present applauded the man as one of the biggest criticisms of the Wall Street occupation is the fact that nobody really knows what the protesters are, well, protesting. Discussion took place regarding this issue. One thing about using pure democracy to organized large event such as this is that even the simplest things take for-fucking-ever. I have no idea how so many people can have so much to say about the simple question of whether or not the demands of the protesters should be decided now or later. While one person announced complete support for defining the rules immediately another said that isn’t fair as many people who wish to participate weren’t present. All of this rigamarole ended in the reading of the Principles of Solidarity. Basically the concern was never directly addressed and discussion went on long enough that everybody more or less forgot what the discussion was originally about.

In my opinion this occupation seems to be a choose your own decision protest. What I mean to say is people basically bring their own grievance to the occupation as opposed to everybody standing united under one agreed upon grievance. I believe this is where the media’s confusion stems from. While the organizing of the occupation is fairly structured and well coordinated the reason for the occupation is neither. This shouldn’t be a surprise to those who are active in the online culture as the culture reflects the Internet is springs from. The Internet is a decentralized system with no singular points of control. Because of this members of the online culture are extremely varied and have a vast array of differing opinions. While one member wants to protest the collusion of corporations and government another will go to protest the banks and yet another may simply want to show up and scream for the fun of it. Most of the time when many people online have differing grievances against the same source they united against that source. The enemy of my enemy is my friend so to speak. It’s similar to how the United States government supported the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia because they were against the Vietnamese government. Well it’s similar minus that whole 2 million people genocided by the Khmer Roughe regine thing.

Either way after a long and pointless sidetrack about whether or not actual demands should be agreed upon before further organization of the occupation continued the organizers listed off some other committees that were needed. After each of the committee names were rattled off the discussion about the occupation’s message cropped back up. It seems at this point people remembered that that particular issue was never actually resolved. After some arduous debate the agreed upon meesage was, “People before profits.” I’m guessing nobody there has a lot of knowledge in economics as such a statement is really self-defeating. Let me take that back, I know nobody there had working knowledge in economics as they were talking about the labor value theory that was brought forth by Marx and proven wrong by reality.

From the start OccupyMN has been advertised as an occupation of the Federal Reserve property in Minneapolis. This target was chosen by an online poll but some debate occurred as to whether or not the location should be changed. From the start I thought the idea of occupying the Federal Reserve property was doomed to failure as that property is privately owned. Rules are quite different from public to private property. Such rules are very murky when dealing with the Federal Reserve though as their property is purchased, ultimately, with tax dollars. As any property purchased with tax dollars can be argued to be owned by the community it seems logical to also argue that the American people have a right to occupy the Federal Reserve property. Some very good arguments were made against occupying the Federal Reserve property including the claim that the building has sharpshooters on site twenty-four hours a day. The last thing a political protester really wants to contest with is a bullet through the head because some cocky government agent thought he could win a bet with his friend on whether or not he was good enough to put a bullet through your right eye while your back was turned to him. Another person claimed that the Federal Reserve used wireless signal jammers which would prevent the use of cellular phones, though I find this claim to be dubious (but wouldn’t be surprised if it is true).

After much debate and many suggestions the protest was moved to the Hennepin Country Government Center Plaza. The Plaza had some rather obvious benefits including bathrooms, access to electricity, and the whole fact that it’s publicly owned land so a court order is needed to remove protesters.

Yet another pointless debate took place on whether or not the date of the protest should be changed. Several speakers explained why another arbitrary date would be better than the currently selected date of October 7th. I felt several of the speakers were attempting to hijack the occupation and make it appear affiliated with other political protests going on during the dates they were advocating. Thankfully common sense prevailed and the occupation date wasn’t changed.

The meeting itself concluded at 18:00 and people split off to join whatever committee they were interested in. This even proved a theory presented by social anarchists wrong. Social anarchists do not believe in money and claim that undesirable jobs will be done by volunteers who realize the necessity of the job. Well nobody volunteer for the sanitation committee at this event even though such a job was certainly necessary. I found that fact fucking hilarious indeed. I did stay for the committee meetings and focused my interest on the communications committee as I was the journalist there. Nothing much of interest happened during the committee meetings and everything was concluded at 19:30.

There you have it, a journalistic piece written by your’s truly. Nobody can every claim again that all I do are opinion pieces (although those are my favorite pieces to write). While news sources claim these types of organizations are incredibly disorganized I can say with authority that they feel very organized when you’re actually at the events. Then again what I did was actual investigative journalist, something most accredited journalist of today have any fucking clue about. Getting a soundbite for the evening news doesn’t tell the real story, which requires somebody on site writing down their observations and interviewing participants. Even though most of the participants seem to have very socialist views in mind, events like this are very individualistic in nature. Each participant really brings their own grievance to the occupation and nobody is bound to any set of rules outside of those already ascribed by society. If you want to go and protest against douche bag Mayor Rybak you certainly can, nobody is going to stop you. These occupations can be summed up as a large group of people being pissed off at various things but wanting a group to join so that their general dissatisfaction doesn’t appear to be isolated to single individuals. Although much less in scale these protests would be similar to the civil rights, gun rights, labor activist, and free market movements all coming together in a single spot whlie each individual continued to fight for their original cause.

Update on the Woman Shot in Golden Valley

Last week I posted a story about a woman who was shot dead by a Golden Valley police officer. Almost no information was made available at the time but the Red Star has an update that may explain what happened:

After Zarrett tried to pull her over, Gordon stopped her white Honda Civic next to the interstate median near the Hopkins Crossroad overpass. The source said that she immediately got out of her car and raised a small handgun in the direction of the officer, who was behind her car. Zarrett fired at her after seeing the gun, the source said.

If this is the case then the officer was likely justified in his actions. Due to the numerous cases of police brutality I’ve read about I am no longer one who generally sides with the police in these matters. But suffice to say if I were in a similar situation (a woman got out of a car and pulled a gun on me) I’d respond in kind by taking measures to preserve my life. We’ll have to see what comes of any potential court case (or maybe footage from a dash mounted camera will be released and clear this entire mess up) to know for certain what went down.

Big Brother in Minneapolis

An alternative title I was considering for this post was The Redistribution of Crime. The Minneapolis police department have started fielding temporary surveillance cameras which they claim will cause criminal activity to go elsewhere:

The portable cameras, more than the fixed ones, seem to make criminals take notice, he said.

“They behave similar to the way they behave if they saw a cop standing on the corner,” he said.

The combination of video and lights disperses unruly crowds quickly, he said. That helped during the University of Minnesota’s Spring Jam, and the cameras have been used at everything from the Uptown Art Fair to the Basilica Block Party and a festival at the LynLake neighborhood this summer, he said.

Note that no claims of preventing crime have been made regarding these mobile cameras. The intended goal appears to be move criminals from area to another area that isn’t currently covered by one of these portable cameras. Considering the astronomical cost of these units I would personally want a bit more than redistributing crime to different parts of the city:

“They’re awesome,” said Rugel, who keeps a board in his office that lists the locations of each of the portable cameras. Rugel said the city has had at least one unit since the Interstate 35W bridge collapse in 2007, but had purchased six more this spring. They cost about $29,000 apiece, according to city records.

At $29,000 a-fucking-piece these things should be able to apprehend criminals and make me breakfast in the morning. According to the Minneapolis website the salary for a new officer ranges between $45,539 and $50,207. The city currently owns seven of these $29,000 cameras costing them a total of $203,000. Had that money been spent to hire new officers the city of Minneapolis could have had four more hands on deck (obviously this excludes the cost of benefits but the cost of the cameras also excludes maintenance). I would argue that a trained police officer is going to be a far more effective tool then a camera. Whereas cameras can only record criminal acts police officers at least have a chance of stopping a crime and are far more useful in the traditional police duty of cleaning up after the criminal.

It should go without saying how Orwellian these cameras are. As the article states deploying surveillance cameras on public streets is perfectly legal. The important issue to note though is that a camera on public property can see what’s happening on private property. I’ll let Bruce Schneier explain the need for privacy and why you should be concerned about these mobile cameras being deployed on your street:

Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we’re doing nothing wrong at the time of surveillance.

[…]

For if we are observed in all matters, we are constantly under threat of correction, judgment, criticism, even plagiarism of our own uniqueness. We become children, fettered under watchful eyes, constantly fearful that — either now or in the uncertain future — patterns we leave behind will be brought back to implicate us, by whatever authority has now become focused upon our once-private and innocent acts. We lose our individuality, because everything we do is observable and recordable.

Just because an activity is legal now doesn’t mean it will be legal tomorrow. In addition to that it’s not unheard of for authorities to prosecute somebody for an activity they did before it became illegal. And even if one isn’t prosecuted for a previously legal but current illegal activity public ostracizing is a real threat. The concern about any surveillance isn’t so much the present but the future.

Personally if one of these cameras are ever deployed near my residence I will use my rather entertaining laser to blind the device while it looks towards my dwelling. While it may be legal for the police to deploy the camera on a public street I in no way consent to these devices looking into my domicile. If they don’t want the camera to be blinded then they can kindly point it elsewhere.

Police Shoot Armed Woman in Golden Valley

Yesterday a Golden Valley police officer shot an armed woman. I bring this story up mainly because the police are being incredibly cagey about it and have refused to release any details whatsoever:

Police said the officer had tried to stop the woman, who eventually pulled over along the median shortly after 1 p.m. Thursday on westbound Interstate 394 in Minnetonka.

“The lone occupant of the vehicle, an adult female, was in possession of a handgun and was subsequently fatally shot by the officer,” according to a statement from Golden Valley police.

At this point we don’t know why the officer shot the woman. Did she take a shot at the officer? Did the officer simply see she had a firearm and shot her on the spot? Who knows. Usually with cases like this some amount of detail is given about the events leading to the shooting but in this case we’ve received nothing. This lack of information makes it appear as though the police are trying to cover it up which is usually done to protect an officer who unjustly killed somebody.

I’m reserving no judgement at this time but I want people to be aware of this story and to pay attention to the details as they are released. It is my hope that this is not another incident of police brutality but until we know for sure I won’t rule the possibility out.

There is a Law Somewhere They Can Use

Our so-called justice system has many flaws including the fact that there are so many laws on our books that it’s impossible for a person to actually be considered innocent in a court. If the state wants you gone they can make it happen because they know somewhere on the books there is a law you’re violating right now and all they must do is find it. Case in point demonstrators on Wall Street are being arrested for violating a 150 year-old law against wearing masks:

New York City police monitoring a social media-fueled protest in Manhattan’s Financial District have charged demonstrators with violating an obscure, 150-year-old state statute that bans masked gatherings.

Since Saturday, five people connected with the protest to “occupy” Wall Street have been issued a violation for running afoul of the antimask law, according to police.

First of all everybody who knew that there are protests going on on Wall Street raise your hands. I’m not expecting many hands to be raised since the media hasn’t been covering this at all but alas these protests have been going on since Sunday:

The protest against U.S. banking institutions began Saturday, drawing hundreds from across the country.

Police blocked off several streets in lower Manhattan, directing protesters to Zuccotti Park. On Monday afternoon, sleeping bags, tents and a potluck buffet were set up in the park to accommodate demonstrators.

Either way this 150 year-old laws is being used simply because the state doesn’t like the fact that these people are exercising their right to peaceably assemble. I can see how it unfolded now; some higher up got upset at the fact that people were causing an inconvenience by protesting and told his army of lawyers to, “Find something, ANYTHING, that we can use to get these fucking peasants off the street!” After receiving their orders the army of lawyers descended upon the local law library and began digging through every book, binder, and filing cabinet to fulfill their quest of finding the holy law. One of the lawyers eventually yelled out, “AH HA! I FOUND IT!” and presented a 150 year-old manuscript to his master who rewarded the lawyer with the promise of a barony promotion.

Laws need expiration dates. Personally I believe every law that is passed should have a mandatory expiration date of one year. If the law isn’t renewed a year from it’s passing or renewal it expires and everybody who was fined or imprisoned for violating that law is refunded and freed. This could help reduce the number of laws on the books as they would need to be debated every year when their expiration date approached. Or we could simply not allow laws creating victimless crimes from being legally enforceable.