Trust No One Especially Baggage Checkers at Airports

I just say this post on Says Uncle. As we all know if you fly with guns you have to put them in checked luggage. This in essence is meant to prevent somebody from coming aboard with a gun and either hijacking the plan or shooting it up. The checked baggage is checked by humans whom are supposed to be airport employees whom you can trust.

Well once again live shows a wrench in the best laid plans as three baggage handlers have been arrested for theft. They were busted as a result of a string operation which was set in place when a retired police officer’s gun was stolen after being checked in at the airport.

This should present a couple major ideas. First and foremost never use those TSA approved locks. These locks for those who do not know are ones which can be opened by any TSA officer should they need to look at an item contained in the locked case. These locks are flimsy and not secure to begin with but knowing anybody with a specific key can open your luggage should worry you. If you don’t have a TSA approved key you will be called to the desk to open the locked container should they need to look at it. This is ideal since you’ll be there to open the case and stand there while they look at it. This means you see everything from the case being opened to the case being closed again so nothing should go missing.

The second thing to note is you should have a plan should your container be stolen. If you have a good case with a good lock it will take the thief some time to open it, in fact they probably won’t get to it before the end of the day when they can get the case home. This means you should be able to put a tracking device inside of the case and it probably won’t be taken out until the thief gets the case back home. The linked tracking device has an option to send SMS texts to you based on outlined criteria. This means you could setup criteria that once the case leaves the airport you get an SMS with it’s location and get periodic updates from then on. This would allow you to track the case and you will know if it’s heading in the right direction. Further should the case be stolen you can tell the police where it went and where is potentially is. Of course the device I linked to is pricey but if you have one or two custom guns in there isn’t not really that expensive considering the cost of losing the guns.

If You’re Going to Scam Try Doing it Somewhere Not Overrun by Security Experts

This is a rather funny but also scary story. An unknown criminal entity setup a fake ATM at a hotel. The fake ATM was meant to steal credit card numbers and provide them to the controlling entity. Well the people who set it up probably didn’t realize that Defcon, an event focusing on security, was going to be in town.

Needless to say a place flooded with security experts meant somebody took note that the ATM didn’t look quite right. After a short investigation they discovered the machine was in fact fraudulent and contacted the police whom took it away.

The scary part here is realizing how sophisticated criminals are becoming. Who would suspect a fake ATM machine? But all that is needed is to create a casing that looks like an ATM and slap a computer with a card scanner in it and you have an instant way of harvesting credit card numbers. For bonus points you can put in a cellular data card tied to a stolen account and have the computer inside the machine transfer the credit card numbers to a compromised computer which in turn will transmit them to the controlling entity.

Of course creating a fully functional fake ATM isn’t necessary. A simple card reading device can be overlaid on an authentic ATM. When you insert your card the overlay will read the card number and then feed it into the ATM. At that point you have no idea your credit card number was recorded by an entity besides the ATM. After a period of time the thief can retrieve the overlay and obtain the recorded credit card numbers. Furthermore to prevent having to physically retrieve the overlay the thief could setup some kind of wireless transmitter inside the overlay which would allow the numbers to be retrieved from a distance.

People trust ATMs because they don’t realize people can make fake imitations which look real. This seems like a job that would be too expensive and sophisticated for a generic criminal and hence nobody worries about it. This story should remind everybody that being paranoid isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Further Research


A Diebold white paper on ATM fraud and security. (PDF)

And Samuel Colt Made Them Equal

Remember that saying that God made all men but Samuel Colt made them equal? I think this story exemplifies that…

http://www.click2houston.com/news/20153320/detail.html

An 18 year old man decided he was going to steal a 74 year old man’s car. Normally the 18 year old would win any such fight due to the advantages of youth. But when Martin Baltazar put a knife to August Peters’s throat and attempted to steal his car he wasn’t expecting the aged man to whip out a gun. Furthermore I don’t think Mr. Baltazar expected the old man to shoot him.

Once again an average citizen uses a gun to stop a crime. But of course the gun banners would have you believe that Mr. Peters should have just surrendered his keys. After all criminals who are willing to put a knife to your neck certainly wouldn’t be willing to kill you even if you gave up your keys right? I mean getting rid of a witness was never a concern of a criminal… oh wait.

I Survived Enemy Territory

So the girlfriend and me went to the Wisconsin Dells this weekend. It was fun but I must say not being able to have your gun on your sure is a change from the normal.

It really irritates me that crossing the boarder from Minnesota to Wisconsin also means I go from being a lawful armed citizen to a defenseless sheep. While at the Dells I noted how screwed everybody would be if a bad guy with a gun showed up and started letting rounds fly. Somehow the government of Wisconsin thinks its citizens are safer without being able to legally carry a concealed weapon (and harassed if they legally open carry a gun). I just don’t get it.

But if You Defend Yourself You May Kill Somebody

Found via Says Uncle…

http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/245067/

The article opens like this…

Note to the folks who keep loaded guns in their houses: that stranger rustling around in your bushes or lurking by your garage may be a teenager playing a game. Don’t shoot.

The article then splits gun owners into two mutually exclusive categories…

There are plenty of folks who value the Second Amendment who also think keeping a loaded gun in the house is stupid stuff. (If there are children in the home, these gun owners see it as criminally stupid stuff.) Their emotional attachment to guns is tied to sport and skill, hunting and marksmanship rather than self-defense.

On the other side are the gun owners who believe they always are a split second away from needing their guns to stop bad guys. It’s too simplistic to say they view guns as instruments of heroism, but their mantra is that “they have the right to protect themselves and their families.” Emotionally, they tie guns to personal honor and self-sufficiency.

And finally closes up with…

Although we often lump all gun owners together, the difference between those two philosophies of gun use is enormous.

The shooting of the teenager reminds us that the second philosophy is deeply flawed – an American myth echoing our frontier past. Guns are lethal weapons, and when a gun is seen as the first (and best) line of defense, tragedies are bound to happen – much more likely, in fact, than saving anybody’s life.

So apparently you either refuse to save your life using a gun or your a psycho path who can’t wait to kill a home invader. According to the article we are supposed to assume somebody breaking into our house is a teenager playing games. Let me tell you something if somebody enters my domicile whom I don’t know without my permission (that’s why we knock on doors people) I am assuming they are hostile and will take what means are necessary to defend myself.

Let’s get this straight somebody comes into your dwelling without knocking at the door, ringing the door bell, calling your, or any other method of announcing their entry and we’re supposed to not respond in a defensive manner because it might be some teenager playing a game? What about the other side of the coin? What if it’s some teenager doing an initiation for a gan that involves killing, raping, or robbing somebody? The bottom line is you haven’t a clue what an invader’s intentions are so you need to act in a manner to protect the most precious thing you have, your family and your life.

Source: http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/29/defies-logic/

For the Minnesotans, A Page Tracking State Home Invasions

I came across a useful site today thanks to AJ187 on the Gun Rights Radio Network forums…

http://mnhomeinvasionwatch.com/

It’s a list of home invasions that have occurred in Minnesota. It’s very nicely setup and even includes a Google Maps application highlighting the location of each home invasion.

I bring this up mostly as proof that even here in Minnesota, where people think they are safe from the scary bad people, we have crime. This should motivate my fellow Minnesotans to at least draw up a plan on what to do should an invader come a knocking.

Moorhead, Minnesota Resident Shoots Invader

I have mixed feeling about this self defense story brought to you by The Red Start…

http://www.startribune.com/local/48680082.html

Vernon Allen of Moorhead, Minnesota shoot and killed an intruder in his apartment on June 20, 2009. That’s the good part now for the part I’m rather concerned about…

Police say a Moorhead man shot and killed an intruder who walked into his unlocked apartment.

Yes he shot and killed an intruder who entered his unlocked apartment. Here in Minnesota a lot of people love to boast how friendly everybody is. They say this friendliness is so strong that there is no need to even lock your doors. Bullshit. You should always have your door locked whether you’re at home or away.

Locking the door offer cheap prevention against unknown individuals entering your domicile. And no matter what a locked door needs to be dealt with whether by kicking through the door or finding an alternative means to gain entry into the building. This gives you time. The next part of this story that bothers me is the following…

He says when he didn’t leave, a fight ensued. The resident then allegedly got his shotgun, which went off during a struggle.

From how the story is written I am to believe that the man entered the fight before retrieving his shotgun. If somebody you don’t know enters your home you should assume ill intent. Upon this assumption you should arm yourself then confront the intruder. Falling out of this order and confronting the intruder before arming yourself is putting you at a disadvantage. Now it could be such a thing where the man was unable to get to his shotgun without going through the intruder but in that case it sounds like his home defense plan needs some tweaking.

Update: Here is a link with more information…

http://www.inforum.com/event/article/id/244383/

Mr. Allen was not charged with any crime which is good. Some people are making a stink that the intruder was only 17 but in my book if you’re old enough to enter a person’s home without permission and fight him you’re old enough to deal with the consequences.

Just Because the Bad Guy is Armed Doesn’t Mean They’ll Win

At least if you’re also armed. From Robb Allen’s blog we have this story…

http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/dpp/news/local/hillsborough/concealed_weapons_permits_rise_061709

The anti-gunners always spout the fact that if you are attacked you’ll be at a disadvantage. This is true but they claim this disadvantage is so great due to your foe being armed and already having their weapon at the ready that you’ll have no chance in Hell of getting to yours. This story flat out destroys that argument…

TAMPA – About a month ago, Audry Sauceda was carjacked and fought back.

He stuck a gun in my side and told me to get out of the car,” Sauceda said while sharing her story with FOX 13 on May 15. “And I pulled out my gun and stuck it in his face, and told him, he needed to get out. He screamed and jumped out of the car.”

Even though the attacker had a gun at the ready the owner of the car was able to get her gun out and into the would be high jacker’s face.

The bottom line is most criminals prey on what they perceive to be easy targets. They want easy money and objects that’s why they are stealing instead of working. To them it’s easier to rob an unarmed person than it is to go to work everyday like the rest of us. But once in a while they find a person who is armed and it turns their life to shit. Not wanting to die most criminals will run at the sight of a gun in the hands of the law abiding.

Of course there will be somebody who says if the woman would have just surrendered her car then she wouldn’t have had a chance of ill happening to her. The problem is you can’t make a deal with a person who is robbing you because you can’t trust them. Just because a criminal says they won’t kill you if you give them your stuff doesn’t mean they won’t kill you.

Source: http://blog.robballen.com/2009/06/19/p3516-getting-the-jump-on-things.post

IANSA Want More Woman Assaulted

Via Snowflakes in Hell we get this story full of hypocrisy…

http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/06/17/global-week-of-gun-violence-prevention/

The International Action Network on Small Arms is promoting International Women’s Day of Peace by promoting the disarming of everybody. Snowflakes in Hell has a great comparison between the likely hood of a unarmed woman being assaulted and an armed women. Personally if I were wanting to cause ill will to anybody, including women, I’d certainly want them unarmed.

This kind of hypocrisy is the Achilles’ heel of the anti-gun movement. They want all the good people disarmed so they push for stronger gun legislation. But by definition a criminal breaks the law and if they are planning on harming another person they aren’t going to avoid breaking any other law to accomplish their goal. The only true form of defense is what you as a person are willing to do.

Source: http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2009/06/17/global-week-of-gun-violence-prevention/

Only in Britain

In Britain every is trained to be afraid of weapons. And not just guns but also knifes. To this effect one of the subjects of Britain has invented an anti-stab knife…

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jun/14/anti-stab-knife-crime

Quoting the inventor…

“It can never be a totally safe knife, but the idea is you can’t inflict a fatal wound. Nobody could just grab one out of the kitchen drawer and kill someone.”

I guess it makes sense in a country where defending yourself is a crime. This way you can’t go to jail for defending yourself with a knife since guns are banned. Next up the anti-bludgeon hard object. Seriously that island is sunk.